Sunday, October 22, 2023

RationalWiki - Are They Part of Pedogate?

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/N9txoSkmbKzE/


https://www.insider.com/day-laborers-paid-to-move-trash-bags-of-body-parts-2023-11

https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/relationships/wisconsin-university-chancellor-fired-for-filming-porn-videos-with-his-wife/ar-AA1ma6xP?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=8448c3fe90c54a38a931922f4ed722c7&ei=25




NEWEST OPRAH  Pushing This Demonic book




PLEASE READ. This is a dangerous book. Be informed!
Beware of the book "Conversations with God"! Oprah is pushing it. It is scary that someone would be bold enough to write a book from God's point of view contrary to His Word. Please send to all with kids or grandkids. If you have children or grandchildren, work with children at church, or you have neighborhood children whose parents you know, please take note of the information below and pass it along to others. Schools are distributing this book to children through the Scholastic Book Club.
James Dobson talked about this book twice this week. It is devastating. Parents, churches and Christian schools need to be aware of it. Two particular books are, Conversations with God and Conversations with God for Teens, written by Neale D. Walsch. They sound harmless enough by their titles alone. The books have been on the New York Times best sellers list for a number of weeks, and they make truth of the statement, "Don't judge a book by its cover or title."
The author purports to answer various questions asked by kids using the "voice of God". However, the "answers" that he gives are not Bible-based and go against the very infallible word of God. For instance (and I paraphrase), when a girl asks the question "Why am I a lesbian?" His answer is that she was 'born that way' because of genetics (just as you were born right-handed, with brown eyes, etc.). Then he tells her to go out and "celebrate" her differences.
Another girl poses the question "I am living with my boyfriend. My parents say that I should marry him because I am living in sin. Should I marry him?" His reply is, "Who are you sinning against? Not me, because you have done nothing wrong."
Another question asks about God's forgiveness of sin. His reply "I do not forgive anyone because there is nothing to forgive... There is no such thing as right or wrong and that is what I have been trying to tell everyone, do not judge people. People have chosen to judge one another and this is wrong, because the rule is "'judge not lest ye be judged."
These books are false doctrine of the devil and quote in error the Word of God. These books (and others like it) are being sold to school children through (The Scholastic Book Club) and we need to be aware of what is being fed to our children.
Our children are under attack. So I pray that you be sober and vigilant about teaching your children the Word of God, and guarding their exposure to worldly mediums, because our adversary, the devil, roams about as a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour (1 Peter 5:8). We know that lions usually hunt for the slowest, weakest and YOUNGEST of its prey.
All reactions:
Natasha Marie
1
Angry
Angry
Comment
Share


Why is RationalWiki cyberstalking me?
They have been for years.

Jordon Sather, and Isaac Green covered Q on YouTube 
I made about 3 videos on Q, knew nothing about it ,left it to them but 
RationalWiki won't leave me alone. 

My YouTube channel was deleted in October 2020, so I could not expose the rigged election, and now 2023, almost 2024, this nutbag site is still giving me a false persona.

They are evil and target certain people, not others,  nothing in their entire site about Isaac Green, or Jordon Sather



They have targeted others 


They are AFTER Trump supporters, which I am one, and he is against child trafficking, they obviously are the opposite


That leaves us to wonder, is this ORG part of child trafficking? Pedophilia?
Are the owners getting donations for being part of child trafficking and don't have to pay taxes?

This site creates enemies and then tries to cyber bully them into submission.  So who is running it?  Sounds like someone nefarious to me.





So much so that I have to file a LAWSUIT in Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
For the Western District of Texas
San Antonio Division
Case #
DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL
 
Natasha DeLima
Plaintiff Pro Se
V
RationalWiki Foundation
Defendant
COMPLAINT FOR LIBEL, DEFAMATION, CYBERSTALKING, HARASSMENT, BULLYING, Texas Electronic Communications Act of 2001, NIED

The Plaintiff is a resident of San Antonio Texas, resides at __________
The Defendant Rational Wiki is a resident of New Mexico, residing at 122 Gerard Avenue, Alburquerque New Mexico, 87106.
JURISDICTION
28 U.S. Code § 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

(a)The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between—
(1)
citizens of different States;

STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. Texas' Electronic Communications Act of 2001 prohibits cyberstalking, cyber harassment and other forms of online abuse or harassment. These are serious criminal offenses in Texas and are viewed as a form of mental assault. Cyberstalking can take a variety of forms, including Cyberbullying.

2. The Defendant poses as an “organization” for tax evasion purposes, and tries to avoid liability as such, but performs online as an entity to demean, harass, abuse, violate, and target whomever they choose, without repercussion.  They perform a one-sided version of reversed facts in order to destroy people or whoever their target is.
3. As listed under their site, they don’t fact check content, nor do they want to assume liability for their content, and in fact, they are liable.
What should I do if I see defamatory material?
While some of RationalWiki's content is satirical (see RationalWiki:SPOV), defamatory material in articles is unwanted and should be removed. Keep in mind that just because you dislike something does not make it defamatory. Statements of opinion are never defamatory. Only false statements of fact may be defamatory. Truth is always a defense in these cases and content should only be removed if it is objectively false. Obvious cases may be removed by anyone but if your removal is reverted or if you think it might be at all controversial you might consider heading to the talk page to bring it up there and probe the community for consensus. Gaining consensus is the best way to assure the removal of such material by giving concerned editors an opportunity to explain why a particular statement of fact is or is not defamatory.
4. The fact is that RationalWiki made criminally false statements about the Plaintiff and had to amend this post, and they continue to add and modify this page, even though the Plaintiff was banned from YouTube in October 2020.  In fact, she was banned for being on the top influencer list, and this fact just gets under the skin of the predators that run this “organization”. 
5. The Plaintiff was targeted, falsely charged, blackmailed, drugged, had 86 court hearings until she was found innocent, and the appeals court had to reverse the rigged trial.   The Plaintiff was among those influencers that they tried to destroy, bully into silence, and lie about.  The Defendant is trying to score here, with nothing but libelous statements, and failure to put any truth into the site.
6. In fact, this site tried to call the Plaintiff mentally ill.  They don’t have a degree, are not doctors, don’t have any proof, or medical records, and in fact, the Plaintiff does not have mental illness, has never been treated for any mental condition, and being held hostage in a hospital and drugged to try to give her a false diagnosis does not qualify for her mental illness, but theirs.
7. The fact that the Plaintiff posted that Hillary Clinton, Obama, and others were part of child trafficking, and that Julian Assange was in touch with her through her channel, just upset the predators at the internet so much they still have not recovered.
According to the Department of Defense, some of the most current 2023 statistics on worldwide human trafficking include: $99 billion is estimated to be made annually through sex trafficking. 4.5 million people throughout the world are victims of forced sexual exploitation. Jan 11, 2023
The DEFENDANT is upset that the Plaintiff has millions of followers, and she exposed the dark secret.  That child trafficking is a business and so many are part of it.  
Oprah ended up being connected ot John of God, who has a life sentence for child trafficking
Who is John of God? Oprah Winfrey under fire as spiritual healer is sentenced to lengthy prison sentence (sportskeeda.com)
The Plaintiff was initially part of aiding Oprah Winfrey in her efforts to start her OWN channel, and the Plaintiff actually ran one of the handles for OWN.  At that time, she had no idea Oprah was part of anything bad or nefarious, but since the years have gone by, she impliciated herself in a few scandals and her fame is so bad that her grifting efforts in Maui fires backfired, and she has finally come to learn how many people know who she is now.  The Plaintiff was so sad and horrified to learn all of this truth.  
Oprah’s Fall Is A Metaphor (buzzfeednews.com)
Even as the truth comes out, frantic Oprah wants to debunk true stories
Oprah Winfrey debunks QAnon sex trafficking conspiracy theory - The Washington Post
8. The Plaintiff made a couple of videos on the Q-Anon story because it was hitting the internet, especially YouTube.  There were new people, one named Jordon Sather, another named Anti-School, Isaac Green that were rising influencers, and deciphering this Q Clearance data that was coming out.  
9. The Plaintiff had no ability to even understand the cryptic messages, so she started watching these 2 intelligent young men and saw them get targeted.  
10. The Initial Defendant post called the Plaintiff mentally ill for her couple of vidoes talking about the Q videos, and oddly the Defendant went after her, but there is NOTHING on their “org site” about either Jordon Sather, or Isaac Green. 
11. When the 2 young men were banned from their channels, and it was THEIR virtual property, the Plaintiff contacted both of these men to see if they wanted to join a class action lawsuit.  Jordon Sather did not want to join, Isaac Green did.  She had not met either of them in person, she just saw their channels.
12. Initially there were a few Plaintiffs in this case, and the Plaintiff was doing all of the work for the lawsuit against Google and YouTube, and others that were banning and discriminating because of their truth and popularity.
13. Isaac Green was young, but he got very greedy, and when the parties defaulted on a response, the pressure mounted, and the corrupt courts started protecting Big Tech and not the Plaintiffs in this case.   Isaac Green became very overwhelmed, but he was getting contacted from Alex Jones, Roger Stone and others and somehow whatever happened to him, one night he contacted the Plaintiff and told her Q was a fraud and a hoax and expected her to get involved when she knew nothing about if that was true or not.  Isaac Green was relentless and kept trying to disavow Q, and pressured the Plaintiff into agreeing with him.  He would not stop.  It occurred at the same time that the Plaintiff’s fiancé was struck and killed by a drunk driver.  
The Plaintiff told Isaac that if he wanted to not post about Q, there were so many other things to post about, it was not his entire platform and just to move on.  Isaac would not relent, he was going after Tracy Beanz, telling her Q was fake on Twitter, and really intense about his stance.  Someone told the Plaintiff that Isaac was paid to use his following to disavow Q, and when the Plaintiff asked him, he blocked her.   She had to remove him from her lawsuit because something went wrong with him, and he would not come clean.  It was as though he became a different person.  The Plaintiff never wanted to reveal any of this online, even though it was true, and she did not want to injure his reputation, so she kept all of the facts that happened to herself, including his text messages.
The Plaintiff had told Isaac that he had to stop talking to other people trying to get into how the lawsuit was going and Isaac would not stop that either.  They were using him to get to the Plaintiff and try to end the case.   Isaac became a liability with his issues, and whatever he was doing with his massive efforts to call out Q. 
The Plaintiff let both Isaac, and Jordon Sather do the Q videos and she led people to their sites as they matched up whatever those crypic posts were about.  Some of the things on there were 100% wrong, however, some were 100% true.  Oddly, the Defendant did not go after Q, or that site that was posting, just the Plaintiff, why that is, the Defendant will have to answer to a jury.
Isaac Green was supposed to come to New Hampshire for a hearing, he and his parents had made reservations, the Plaintiff invited his parents so they could look after their son, as the Plaintiff knew this was best for him.  When Isaac would not stop, would not relent, would not stop asking the Plaintiff to read his Q email that stated Q was fake, the Plaintiff just dropped him and said if he did not stop, she could not help him w/ the case.  He was also jeopardizing her rights to her channels, without a single care.  
During the death of her fiancé, the Plaintiff post poned a hearing for her right to grieve, and during that time, Isaac was also dropped due to his own actions, and his refusal to stop responding to everyone asking him for an interview.  
The Plaintiff told Isaac Green if Alex Jones and everyone else was offering to help him, then he should go seek it from them.  Once Isaac realized that no one was going to help him, he got angry and even more lost.  He tried to put out music videos, and he bought a whole studio of equipment and computers from the money he received from donations, much were my audience helping him, and the truth is, he was not a good singer.  The audience was not responding to him the way he thought, and he blew through whatever money he was paid.

14. The Defendant RationalWiki, NEVER CONTACTED the Plaintiff by any means, they never “fact-checked” themselves and they cannot get away with libel under any means, even a satire site.  Why they are still obsessed with her is a mystery.  It’s been almost 4 years since they took her off of YouTube.  She removed her own status on sites in order to shield her from stalkers like the Defendant.
15. Satire can mean untrue, but it cannot mean a false persona.  The Plaintiff is nothing like the fake satire they concocted, because whoever runs this site has an affliction with the demons in their soul, and the fact that the Plaintiff is good, they are sick and evil.
16. The Plaintiff would invent her own satire of this Defendant and what ails them, are they cross dressers, pedophiles, child abusers, drug addicts, satanic child sacrifice worshipers?  No clue, but if anyone fact checked them, and their obsession with the Plaintiff, one of the above would be true.
17. The facts remain that their actions are criminal, cyber stalking, cyber bulling and against Texas law.  They are in fact criminal.  

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

18. Internet does not mean that people don’t get consequences for their shameful crimes and actions, it means that they do.  It’s easy to trace every link, even the computer it comes from and every intentional action.  The Defendant is its own version of the dark web, trying to hide themselves when they are exposing exactly who they are.

19. The Defendant never put the dismissed charges, the reversal of a case ruling the truth about a hospital holding the Plaintiff hostage and not letting her out, drugging her with something that altered her mind and thinking until it wore off, and the fact that she had to call Dr. Phil in order to get a release from the hospital.   The fact that any hospital can only hold people that are a danger to themselves, or the community, and the Plaintiff was none of that.  They targeted the Plaintiff because she knew about their crimes.  Their pedophilia, their child trafficking, and the judges were corrupt and all part of it.   The government in MA spent over 1 million dollars to try to destroy, imprison and harm the Plaintiff and she still won. 
20. This tacky pedogate fake organization, the Defendant, failed to list the Plaintiff as a successful business owner, that survived 9/11, and COVID, and that she owned several businesses, and never ever gave in to the deep state.  
21. This tack pedogate fake organization, the Defendant, failed to post articles on the AM raids by influencers like the Plaintiff, and that so many of the targeted people were right.  So whatever is wrong w/ the Defendant, it’s shining headlights on them, not the Plaintiff.
22. The Plaintiff fought the system and exposed the corrupt judges, all of the way to the supreme court, in fact, they don’t do their jobs.  There have been several judges forced into retirement for what they did to the Plaintiff, and this joke of a blog forgot to mention that.  They forgot to mention that the appeals court in MA, only reverses about 5% of cases, and they reversed the fake charges on the Plaintiff, why is that?
The Defendant forgot to post that the Plaintiff as a Pro-Se litigant got her case through the SCOTUS list, and only 5% of cases even make it in.  
23. The Plaintiff can open an investigation into ALL of the Players at this organization, including their wealth and assets, and she has no problem doing that, but for the immediate case at bar, the Defendant is guilty of creating a fake profile that violates Texas law, and is meant to harm and injure the Plaintiff, and they continue to update it and keep it right under her name on the internet.  She sought to have them remove it last time, and they refused, now it’s time to have them pay for the damages.
24. The Plaintiff is distressed as anyone would be, that is the intention of the Defendant, and luckily, the sober unmedicated Plaintiff is able to proceed with seeking damages. 
25. When Bill Mayer calls out Harvard Law School for the Predators that they are, it's time to rethink defaming the brave people like the Plaintiff that have the guts to call them out.  
https://decider.com/2023/10/21/bill-maher-scolds-harvard-students-for-siding-with-terrorists-on-real-time/

DAMAGES SOUGHT
Relief should be granted under Texas 2001 Electronic Communications Act, and Libel, NIED and all of the regulations promulgated under these statutes. 

The Plaintiff seeks $25 Million dollars for what they have done.  She seeks that they delete the entire fake blog and remove it from her name on Google, She seeks that every day that they continue to have it up, they are charged $50K per day, and even rewriting it is not an option.  They have falsified her persona since they put the blog up and need to be stopped by doing this to anyone.  

DRAFT  October 22, 2023










on

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)