Thursday, August 23, 2018

David Perez Perkins Coie - Did you pass the bar??? or a bar????

DAVID PEREZ IS A NON-PARTY, THAT FILED FOR AN APPEARANCE AFTER RYAN MZARIK DEFAULTED GOOGLE, YOUTUBE & BLOGSPOT

https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/professionals/david-a-perez.html






********************************************************************************
********************************************************************************

September 2018

Perkins Coie - how corrupt?  Named as a party to election interference
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bn6QMZkzi7M

David Perez answers the objection to his adding himself to a case to which he is not party, by filing a response stating that he "followed court rules" by filing within 14 days.

What has happened to Ryan Mzarik who defaulted his own clients, ooops and then magically, you appear when you are not party to this case, filed anywhere but the appeal?

http://natashanews18.blogspot.com/2018/08/ryan-mzarik-perkins-coie-defaulted.html


https://thegoldwater.com/news/35197-San-Francisco-S-hole-Price-Tag-for-New-Poop-Patrol-To-Clean-up-Human-Feces

Did you pass the bar?  or a bar??




No one could lawfully file any paperwork in the lower court case for these Defendants, since no one filed for an appearance.  But David Perez added himself and has nothing to actually appeal, but blank paper.



He has no paperwork in the lower court case.

Federal Case # 17-CV-733  Concord NH Federal Court
Appeal Case # First Circuit Court of Appeals  MA  18-1728

David does not have one document on the entire case, the docket sheet or anywhere else, it's hard to believe he is this insane and desperate, (and of course while judging other cases all over the map on Twitter

He is associated with Timothy McClaughin, that did default all of these other Defendants, but who is trying to now file for an appearance on behalf of all of them, despite his failure to do so in the lower court.

The Appeal was necessary , since the lower court, jaded and party to Democrats, not justice or the Constitution, refused to issue default rulings and end the case.

So there are now 7 attorneys on this case,  one which defaulted 3 of his own clients,  Ryan Mzarik, who lied to me to get an extension, and then defaulted these clients with Tim McLaughlin, and Go Fund Me was defaulted, and rather than pay out damages, the court issued an additional service and added 2 attorneys.  What kind of law is this?  Answer, all parties to embezzlement and other crimes, and 7 or 20 attorneys cannot change court records of the defaults.  So why is David spewing about cases all over the country, when he is here trying to represent defaulted clients that embezzle (YouTube) (Google) and he was not party at all to the District Court case???

David has not responded to any emails, he's too busy trying to talk about other cases on Twitter

http://natashanews18.blogspot.com/2018/08/timothy-mclaughlin-shaheen-gordon-how.html

Top Class action cases against YouTube Twitter Google Facebook
Facebook settlements
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/858992-facebook-class-action-says-cambridge-analytica-scandal-caused-actual-damages/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/857267-facebook-advertising-class-action-lawsuit-challenges-ad-click-rates/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/856847-facebook-class-action-lawsuit-alleges-data-sharing-partnerships/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/856428-judge-may-grant-early-discovery-facebook-data-mining-class-action/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/847313-facebook-class-action-says-advertisers-pay-inflated-cost-per-click/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/844151-facebook-data-mining-class-action-says-class-members-easy-find/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/842904-facebook-users-granted-class-cert-facial-recognition-lawsuit/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/842177-facebook-class-action-challenges-collection-android-users-call-text-data/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/840397-facebook-class-action-challenges-call-text-history-collection/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/837475-facebook-must-non-facebook-user-facial-recognition-class-action-lawsuits/

YouTube
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/814085-youtube-class-action-new-guidelines-cost-content-providers-thousands/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/856783-facebook-twitter-google-face-1b-free-speech-class-action/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/832133-6000-twitter-instagram-privacy-class-action-settlement-claims-flagged/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/342054-plaintiffs-claim-twitter-knew-violating-privacy-rules-class-action-says/

Google
https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/856074-outlook-email-users-could-have-been-victims-of-google-mail-scanning-advertising-scheme/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/856072-outlook-users-may-have-been-affected-by-google-email-scanning/

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/investigations/855923-google-violated-privacy-of-non-gmail-users-lawsuit-investigation/