https://www.bitchute.com/video/Kgo6svMqExLI/
Pedophiles in politics
The 5th Circuit court denied my writ based on lies, and I called them out.
Their denial
My answer
Tim Walz subopenaed on 250Million missing covid funds
The US Courts actually do not even have a stand on COVID money, it was federally funded and NH and many other states are being criminally investigated for the embezzlement of these funds.
Currently there are at least 15 investigations going on with this money.
George COPIDAS, the NH Insurance Commissioner Defaulted 4 times, and the courts are COVERING for him, over bias of me and my political views. They are not even ruling under the Constitution.
Default = default and it happened 4 times
MILLIONS OF COVID FUNDS DELIVERED TO NH
Democrat lawyer convicted of COVID funds theft
New Hampshire lottery suspends gaming license on Senator that misused COVID funds
COVID funds are the most tracked money ever dispersed by the Gov't
Mike Gill Evidence
Governor Sununu of NH is resigning, want to know why? He's in trouble for COVID funds and more
People filing complaints for COVID theft in NH
People are going after him for his crimes. This will include all of the people that embezzled COVID funds.
Ignoring of the Constitution in laws and elections
USA is gone, the rule of law is gone
Cocaine in the Whitehouse
Jill Biden Trans video for Christmas
Hunter Biden does not testify to Congress, just makes a speech from the stairs.
Gay Sex Video in the Senate Chambers
This is how bad it is, and what has been built up for our lifetimes.
The corrupt judges, DA, DOJ have all been so compromised that nothing can be fixed and this IS the last stand
OHIO Judge gets Suspended
When a court, and it's corrupt judges allow for criminal theft of funds based on your conservative views
and they don't even care if the other side defaults but they won't issue a ruling and reject pleadings of a person
trying to fight for their own money??? The entire system is gone.
Rudy Guiliani hit w/ $148 Million in damages the same day that Georgia admits to election fraud?
The December 19th meeting was cancelled as they admitted they did find fraud
President Trump video on targeting the conservatives - including at the banks
Can the public please HELP me get a default ruling?
Please be Kind, and professional.
The following options are available to help me get justice:
Email to :
Please issue a default ruling on Case # 5:23-CV-00934-SC
and grant the Writ of Mandamus
# USCA 23-50780
since the Defendant/Appellee has failed to ever file for an appearance since August 2023, in 4 separate cases for the same claim.
The original case #SA23-CV-00934-FB was defaulted on by the Defendant.
Unlawfully transferred to New Hampshire District court instead of issuing a default ruling
Case #1:23-CV-00458-LM-AJ Defaulted on in October October 31, 2023
5th Circuit Court Case #23-50760 Defaulted On In November 2023
Every party that does not file an answer within the court rules for civil procedure has defaulted. The civil rules then have the duty of the court clerk to issue a default ruling and order of payment.
Please issue the default ruling in accordance with the law.
Rule 55 – Default; Default Judgment(a) Entering a Default. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default.
_____________________
X Post, and X accounts, please repost this
5th circuit phone number,
504-310-7700
Please issue default ruling on case
#23-50760
Natasha v George Copidas
Insurance Commissioner
COURT CASE UPDATE = December 4, 2023
George Copidas has defaulted in Western District Court,
New Hampshire Court 5th Circuit court of appeals
But you have Lyle Cayce trying to bypass the legal system and rules of civil procedure and send an Unpublished order he filed on November 28, 2023 and mailed it to me, never served me electronically, despite me being approved for an electronic case.
I filed on December 3, 2023, a Request for a Default Ruling because of George's 4 defaults.
It's frightening how corrupt our courts are, and that they will commit crimes instead issue default rulings.
This order would have had to have been sent to me electronically, and was not.
WHEN they fail to use the rules of civil procedure, it's as though this was never even sent.
Tucker Carlson when they try to enslave us because they won't hear our truth, we are ruled by criminals
When I was 18 years old and hired off of my graduation stairs to go work at Digital Equipment, and promised they would pay for my college and send me to Harvard, no one knew why I never did that. Back in the day, we never talked about it.
My boss was married, and over 40, with 2 kids, and a wife. He did drugs, and cheated on his wife. One of my job duties was to change his 1st class tickets for travel for 2 coach and let him bring his mistress and say nothing.
One day, when he was high on cocaine, he told me that I was going to stay late at his office and have sex with him in the conference room. I was petrified, and never came back from lunch. I called after that to use my vacation time of 3 weeks built up and quit.
Human resources called me in for a meeting asked me what happened. I told them nothing, we never could back in that time. They begged me to tell them what went wrong. I left my benefits, health insurance, and life, where I had an apartment, bills due, and walked out the door. No job, no college degree, no ability to ever pay that on my own.
It was weeks before I got another job, and still kept what happened to myself. No one understood. I could not even tell my parents because my father would have gone in to the job, and been in trouble for however he handled that boss sexually harassing his daughter.
It was about 2005, some decades afterwards but before my mom died, that I finally told her the truth. She cried for me, and knew that my entire life's plan was altered by what that boss did.
I worked for a couple of lawyers, but I never wanted to be victimized again, I suffered so many bad dreams from fear after that threat of having to sleep w/ a disgusting married man, that had affairs all over the job, because he did cocaine, and so did other women much older than I was, and chose to get free cocaine for sex. I was not like that, and just never thought in my life that my job was in jeopardy over someone forcing me to have sex in order to work for them.
I learned the law because I needed to, spent hours in the law library, learned how to file pleadings, and hated it. But it was my only way to survive.
October 31, 2023
Judge Biery refuses to put my case on appeal. He has denied my affidavit of indigence, despite my inability to pay.
Here is my debt left from what stealing my unemployment money and keeping my business running waiting for the money.
NHES told me, and put in writing that I was going to be given this money, so I stayed in my store lease, paying my rent, and for many months, the store was not even open.
It was even higher, I paid it down in the past year. It was over $35K at one point.
I also have a car loan, due every month, after my mustang was totaled when I got to Texas.
I filed a Writ of Mandamus to the 5th Circuit after this, because Judge Biery is trying to prevent my case from going on appeal, despite their being a default, and my right to appeal.
While this couple was caught embezzling from COVID funds, and the PPP program, this court, George Copidas & the court think they will never go to prison for the crimes of stealing these funds. Even though I have filed criminal charges after this default, the court is aiding George rather than allowing me to be paid what I am due.
Here is where you report on Federal Judge misconduct:
Clerk of the US Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
600 S. Maestri St.
New Orleans, LA 70130
Judges cannot obstruct justice and block you from your right to use the court system, nor can they rig the outcome because "they don't like you".
WRIT of Mandamus
MISCELLANEOUS COURT DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
5TH CIRCUIT
____________________________________________
On Petition of Writ of Mandamus for
US District Court for the Western District of Texas
San Antonio Division
Case # 5:23-CV-00934-SC
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Chestney & Judge Biery
________________________________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus w/ Appendix in Support
_______________________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST FOR NATASHA ATHENS AND HER BUSINESS – FAVORITE THINGS BOUTIQUE
Federal Circuit Rule 47.4(a) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1,
1. The Petitioner was allotted money for this business under the CARES act for self–employment during the COVID pandemic.
2. As the sole Proprietor, she filed and was approved for those funds for her business, in writing, and promised them by NHES, in charge of disbursement of those funds.
3. The Petitioner was lied to, and while they held those funds for over 2 years, NHES promised they were “being sent”. After their unlawful denial, the Petitioner WON on appeal all of the funds back to the beginning of March 2020.
4. On the last day of payment due for that appeal, the NHES commissioner reversed a 3-panel judge decision for no lawful reason and kept those funds.
5. When the Petitioner sued the Commissioner he could not and has not responded to the lawsuit.
6. The Defendant has had the opportunity to represent himself or hire an attorney and did not. His appearance or testifying would land him in prison.
He never should have victimized the Petitioner’s or any other business, but the time is now to pay the damages he caused.
Natasha Athens
November 1, 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST.............................................. 1
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................................3
STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES............................ 4
RELIEF SOUGHT..................................................... 5
ISSUES PRESENTED.............................................. 5
QUESTION OF LAW …......................................... 8
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT............................................................. 5
Exhibit of Petitioner Wining on Appeal ….......... PDF File
Request for a Default ruling …........................ PDF File
A Writ Of Mandamus Is Necessary To Prevent Irreparable Prejudice.
…...................................................................... 9
FACTS NECESSARY TO UNDERSTAND PETITI.......... 13
Mandamus Is Appropriate Because Fifth Circuit Case Law Requires Transfer
5TH CIRCUIT OBLIGATION TO THE RULE OF LAW ….14
CONCLUSION .........................................................................15
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
1. The US Constitution
2. In Re NETFLIX, INC. , No. 21-190 (Fed. Cir. 2021) :: Justia
3. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/09/08/5th-circuit-ruling-covid-content-moderation/#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Court%20of%20Appeals,on%20the%20coronavirus%20and%20elections.
White House coerced tech giants, violated free speech, court rules (usatoday.com)
STATEMENT ON RELATED CASES
There are no related cases where any judge on the earth tried to move a 1 party case to another state rather than do their job and issue a default ruling.
There are no related cases where judicial bias supersedes everything else, and the rule of law is ignored, while conspiring and aiding in embezzlement of CARES act funds for a small business.
STATUES & RULES
1. Rulings for Default
Rule 55 Default Ruling
2. 31 CFR § 901.2 - Demand for payment
3. CARES Act for Self-Employment the CARES Act makes state unemployment benefits available to self-employed, freelance, independent contractors and other gig workers unemployed or underemployed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Benefits are boosted by $600 over regular state benefits, and can be claimed for up to 39 weeks
Coronavirus Relief Fund | U.S. Department of the Treasury
The CARES Act established the $150 billion Coronavirus Relief Fund. Treasury has made payments from the Fund to States and eligible units of local …
4. The Petitioner WON her case on appeal by a 3-panel judge awarding her all of the money due under the CARES act.
There were other victims than the Petitioner. The NHES Commissioner, the Defendant did this to other victims in the state. The reason he could not appear, or allow for discovery, is that this crime of theft of these funds and unlawful enrichment would have put him in prison for years. The court aided in this crime and unjustly refused to allow the Petitioner the right to her money after she filed her lawsuit and the Defendant never responded.
RELIEF SOUGHT
The Petitioner seeks a default ruling from the 5th circuit court of appeals. She seeks that the unlawful rulings made by the Western District court are reversed, and that this case ends here on appeal. There is no transfer to an out of state court and the rule of diversity ignored.
There is no judge that can refuse to issue a default ruling and alter the outcome of a case. They cannot rule with judicial bias and disdain for a Petitioner.
The Petitioner seeks a total of $225,000.00 plus court costs Court costs of $350.00 Overnight mail $28.00 Money for Service $80
The Petitioner seeks that this default is paid to her immediately, and that if not paid out of the bond, or funds at the NHES office, that they are taken out of the Defendant’s assets or salary. This money is DUE to the Petitioner by any means under the law.
ISSUES PRESENTED
Has the Rule of Law been erased? Default means Default
Is the bias towards a 64-year-old Conservative Pro-Se Litigant a national crisis?
Is there anyone that will allow the Petitioner to have her own money?
CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST
Natasha Athens – Pro Se Petitioner
The Petitioner certifies the following:
1. The Petitioner filed a civil case within her state residence of San Antonio Texas and used the federal rule of diversity to seek damages on her right to her own money, the basis of her civil claim.
2. The Defendant in that matter failed to file any response, nor return pleadings when he had been served them by accident, along with checks made out to the local Sheriff, and received the overnight envelope and signed for it. This meant he was aware that the Petitioner had indeed sued him after he overturned her unemployment appeal and won that appeal.
3. The Petitioner filed a Motion to Accept Service as there are alternate forms of service, and the Defendant was served this motion as well as other motions. He never filed any responses, nor did he return the mail addressed to the Sheriff and only after 2 months, and past the date of default did he have someone else return the checks for service, but kept the civil case, the letter to the Sheriff and the summons from the court.
4. After the September 11, 2023, deadline for response, the Petitioner filed requesting a default ruling, and the Magistrate Judge, Elizabeth Chestney, wrote an order, colluding with New Hampshire court, and writing as though she was the Defendant’s attorney. She then recused herself from the case.
5. There is no denying that the Petitioner has access to the diversity rule and properly filed her case. The fact that the bias in the court prevented either the magistrate judge, or Judge Biery to issue a default is unfathomable. They continued to collude with a New Hampshire court, one with a previous bias, and failure to adhere to any laws at all, and this then became not a single day about the Petitioner’s case, her right to her money, but only a way to thwart her right to even use the legal system at all.
6. The court denied the Petitioner access to the legal system as remedy for any wrongdoing by anyone, and denied her access to all of the lawful rulings that should be automatic, especially in a case where someone took her right to her money. It was shocking to see court staff aiding and abetting a corrupt commissioner who was misappropriating funds to the lawful recipients.
CARES acts funds were specifically designated to help small businesses survive and put into effect during the COVID pandemic, and they were not given and withheld, and destroyed many businesses. The NHES office wrote in writing that the Petitioner would receive these funds, and then they failed to pay them. They also lured her into deception, and she put things on credit cards awaiting the funds they said were coming to her.
The NHES Commissioner, the Defendant could not appear in court, nor file any responses, and no one could represent him. Anyone that did would be subject to that embezzlement.
QUESTION OF LAW
The District Court, nor any judge can take a position of partiality, and choose to aid the Defendant (who defaulted) over the Petitioner.
Is the Constitution erased?
Are judges now so biased that they become the Defendant’s attorneys?
Magistrate Judge Chestney, the Defendant Sympathizer, had 0 regard for the rule of law, but targeted the Petitioner. Then once she recused herself, Judge Beiry continued to target the Petitioner.
If a person buys a car, the seller says it comes with an engine, the purchaser gets the car and it has no engine and goes back to the seller and the seller says, well I need more money, then you can have an engine. Would one person do that? Answer is no.
The Petitioner was indigent before this case began and lost everything to this Commissioner. She put the initial court fee on a credit card and received 0 justice or use of the law from this court. On appeal, she properly filed the Notice of Appeal and the Affidavit of Indigence, explaining at age 64, does not work and receives $899 a month from social security, she does not have funds to file this fee. And from a court that has denied her access to use of the court system, and the rule of law.
Why is any judge that has substituted their oath for ignoring the job they have? If they cannot use a gavel to issue a default ruling, they need to be removed from the bench. They don’t get to send a 1 party case somewhere else because they are too biased to do their job.
Indigence is a person’s right to use when they qualify. This judge is trying to thwart the Petitioner’s right to her appeal.
His venom is being seen across the internet, and he should not be able to target people with his position as a federal judge.
A Writ of Mandamus Is Necessary to Prevent Irreparable Prejudice
So far, the Petitioner has had 2 additional months of abuses from this court, where a default ruling should have been issued. And demand payment with interest. If Judges had to pay out their corrupt rulings from their own pockets, there would be far more fair rulings.
In this case however, the crime of preventing justice upon the Petitioner is a whole new issue.
This case needs to be removed from all parties that cannot do their jobs and issue a ruling. The Petitioner has a right to her money, and that is not within the Western Division San Antonio Court.
2. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals should apply the rule of law and justice for the Petitioner and her right to her money and what it cost her to lose her business due to the Greed and lawlessness of the Commissioner.
3. This law protects the Petitioner from the abuses that she is enduring and does not allow for the Prevention of her appeal for a fee she is not financially able to pay.
4. The Laws and rules that are all part of this case are massive and have been ignored.
29 CFR § 1606.8 - Harassment,
Embezzlement of CARES Funds
NIED
5. Bias against a Pro-Se Litigant
The reasoning behind that decision means that the Constitution requires our justice system to be neutral towards the self-represented litigant. That in turn means that the courts must offer a level playing field for the represented and unrepresented alike, consistent with basic principles of fairness.
A Lawful judge treats lawyers and Pro-Se litigants equally, since they both have the same rights to use the system. Only a corrupt judge fears anyone that understands the Constitution, and that they are replacing their own substitution of the rule of law and replace that with their own unexplained opinions.
28 U.S. Code § 144 - Bias or prejudice of judge
6. MOST important – Default Rule 55
Grounds for granting a motion for default judgment in Texas exist if a defendant fails to respond to the lawsuit and make an appearance in the matter. Plaintiffs must make a request before the court will grant a motion for default judgment in Texas. Most importantly, a default judgment is binding on both parties.
There is NO court anywhere in the USA that “forwards” a case that they don’t want to issue a default for. Their bias is not part of the picture. Their bias means they are not fit to serve as judges at all.
The Petitioner has always tried to adhere to the rule of law, and has not always agreed with certain laws, but unless they are changed, they are the law.
Fighting for one's right to their own survival is not something that should be targeted or embezzled from. The harder life is to own a business and have everything stacked against a person. Economy, the weather, shopping needs, and things like a pandemic. The money they offered was only a Band-Aid over the losses, and it was due to everyone equally that was fighting to save all they invested.
People with weekly paychecks don’t even have any idea how hard it is to depend on sales from people in hard times and bad economies. They worry about the prices they pay for food and gas. Business owners pay more to get everything, and then have people not able to shop and buy things. Business owners owe rent, lights, heat, in 2 places, their homes, and their business.
When the Government allowed a small amount to each business, it was for them to be able to survive and pay the business bills. In most cases, it did not even cover the entire rent, while businesses were closed and not able to operate for close to 3 years.
The fact that this was not paid to a single business should bother everyone that reads this case, and the fact that the Defendant could not even risk responding because it was all true, says everything.
There is not a lawful court in the land that should not just end this matter with a Default ruling and prayer for the Petitioner. Anything less has to do with very corrupt people that have been doing things wrong for a long time and ignore the Constitution.
There are many cases in Texas and everywhere that have had to seek writs from courts that are substitution their own opinions for the rule of law.
All of the way up to SCOTUS, judges FEAR Pro-Se litigants. They would not be doing that if not for corruption. The reason that people have to fight this hard on their own and without lawyers, is that judges also target lawyers that take on cases that go against the status quo and fight for the rights of victims like the Plaintiff. If a lawyer took on this case for the Plaintiff, the lawyer would be targeted.
Many cases have ugly content, a court of law decides right down the Constitution that was put into place for the exact situations that they knew could arise over 200 years ago. The lifetime appointed judges have evaded the rule of law for decades and one of the last Constitutional courts is the 5th Circuit court of appeals.
To erase the Plaintiff’s right to her money, her default, and rule on the crimes of everyone involved means that this court has erased Pro-Se rights, the rule of law, and targets Pro-Se litigants.
There is no such thing as a “liberal judge”. The rule of law means that a default is a default.
People forget that the Defendant has had time since this case began and can settle it at any time, even on appeal. The Plaintiff reached out to the Defendant, even after the default, and asked for a lesser settlement than the amount she sued for. She has no way to recover her lost business, her sold off assets, her costs to move, and her costs to pay off credit card debt into the thousands.
A court is impartial by the swearing of their oaths, and cases like this are simple to resolve. The lawful right thing should be done.
The fact that the Western District Court targets the Plaintiff and Pro-Se litigants means that corruption rules that court, and the judges in it. It’s sad, and the world is watching them do it.
Letter to the editor: SCOTUS discriminates against pro se litigants - The Indiana Lawyer
Petition for Writ of Mandamus (01214429).DOCX (eff.org)
In the above Petition, there are multiple cases on why that Petitioner needed a writ.
FACTS NECESSARY TO UNDERSTAND THE PETITION
Judge Biery has refused to even allow for this case, and the Petitioner’s indigent status to allow this case out of his clutches and to a correct ruling. While refusing to allow the Petitioner to use the legal system, he’s trying to extort not one but 2 fees for the same case and denying her indigent status.
The Petitioner lost her business and all of her personal property and needs to have this default ruling and receive her money and start once again.
The fact is that no one can bar the Petitioner from her right to the US court system.
The Petitioner prays upon the 5th Circuit that they do the right thing and uphold the Constitution. Closure is the best remedy for all parties, and this is what the justice system is supposed to uphold.
REASON FOR GRANTING THE WRIT
While the District Court has truly lost its way, and has done everything wrong to the Petitioner, the remedy is for the next level to uphold all rules that applied to the case in the first place.
Having an opinion on a case does NOT align with the rule of law when a party does not answer. The Defendant in the matter is older than the Petitioner and chose his own actions. There is no defending them and this court can see that he expected others to carry his water while he reaped unlawful rewards. Only a certain few would ever agree to that, and that is on them, not on the Petitioner.
If she did not try to fight the unlawful actions in the first place, she could not have lived with that choice.
The fact that people have a personal bias against her persona is sad, and unfortunate but the law does not permit that to cloud her right to recover funding that was meant for her.
In the time the Petitioner has left in her life, she’s trying to leave something for children she cared for, and for people to have access to a system that protects them and does not let people destroy all dreams and all efforts for people to follow a dream and provide a talent, or service to a community. By ignoring that right and the money allotted for that to be taken away for no reason, the court is stating that no one should even try out their dreams or attempt to survive in society that only has one rule. Society functions from the dreams of everyone, the backbone of USA is small businesses. They are unique and suffer so many economic setbacks.
The reason to grant this Writ is simple – it supports everything that was meant for the Petitioner’s rights – rights to funds allotted to her, and being denied with a bias that is inexplicable. A Default by the Defendant answers all questions if the Petitioner’s claims are true.
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT HAS AN OBLIGATION
To uphold the rule of law, on Defaults and the Petitioner’s rights to her own money.
This case needs to be put onto appeal since the Western District will not assemble the record and move the case to the 5th Circuit.
The Fifth Circuit considers “private” and “public” interest factors in deciding motions to transfer, as detailed in Marten’s Venue Motion. (A55-56). As demonstrated in the motion, every factor either weighs in favor of transfer or is neutral. No factor weighs against transfer.
CONCLUSION
The court should allow for the Writ, move the case to the 5th Circuit and issue the default ruling. The 5th Circuit should not rule with bias or prejudice and simply allow the Petitioner to have the money that was allotted for her business.
The case should be removed from the district court and the rulings of a recused judge that colluded with a court 1500 miles away where the Petitioner is no longer a resident, should be nullified as unlawful ruling to a default.
Natasha Athens
November 1, 2023
October 4, 2023
I filed Motion to Recuse, and Motion to hold the case in Abeyance
Later today the Judge recused herself
I called George Copidas today and left a
voicemail asking him to settle.
He kept the documents that did not belong to him, including the summons, and the claim in order to steal it and not let me have it back to be served.
I then filed with the court that he had kept the documents, (meaning he served himself) instead of returning them to me, and he can argue on his behalf if he does not like the default ruing.
But no one that is not a party can have conctact with the court or judge to seek "special" anything, that is criminal. I am not saying that happened, but something did in order for anyone to try to move my case out of my state of residence when it was properly filed.
The court needs to issue a default ruling and allow for objection, or proceed to see that I am paid.
As I explained to the court, for the first time in my life, since the days of being in a crib, I do not even have a bed.
When you lose everything, and your business and have to move, because someone kept your money, you have to build it back.
See video of my air mattress and my old store that I had to liquidate, not once, but 2 times during COVID.
That was the money I had to give to my foster children for their inheritance.
And money for me to live for my final years, it was gone in a second due to what the virus did, that was WHY there was state assistance. No one had the right to overturn a 3 panel judge on appeal.
Fighting for your rights does not make anyone popular, but people like myself do not have a choice. This money does not even cover what I lost, I could have sured for double and proven the devastation. I settled for what I could live with to pay off thousands in credit card debt, and thousands in business loss.
I documented the multiple phone calls, emails, and service to the Defendant of all of the pleadings, the court does not have an option to "dismiss" my claim. I need a default ruling, and my right to collect this money.
/s/ Natasha Athens
October 4, 2023
______________________________
Judge Tries to move my case out of Texas? Say what? Too corrupt for my brain
Update on my case
I filed a lawsuit for my own money, that was due me in New Hampshire as a business owner.
In New Hampshire under COVID, when our Governor Chris Sununu closed small businesses, the state and federal laws put in funding that was to keep businesses afloat.
CARES Act funds
It became a money grab for the greedy and their unchecked power, and George Copidas is the employment Commissioner.
His salary is about $200K a year, he has a family. Shown in the video are his multi- million dollar properties.
George and his lawyers Eric Bal and Iyana Brideau aided in non-payment of those benefits to the rightful people.
https://www.nhes.nh.gov/about/commissioner.htm
When I filed for the appeal of the money I was due under the Cares Act, I won, and was awarded all of the money that I was entitled to.
George Copidas OVERRODE a 3 panel judge and denied my appeal and payment of that money to me.
They also timed it as I was moving, so I could not file for an appeal in New Hampshire.
I tried many times to resolve this case, including out of court before I filed here in Texas. No one from New Hampshire responded
They fear no consequences for their actions, nor even losing their bar licenses for taking payments FROM the intended businesses. They did not just do this to me, they did this to others. Some of them were not able to fight for their own rights to their own money.
More than half of the businesses could not save their business, and many just did not have money to hire lawyers, even to fight for their own compensation.
Ultimately, I filed in Texas Federal Court
Case # 5:23-CV-00934-SC
George Copidas did not respond to the lawsuit, he did not hire a lawyer, he proved despite my own error of serving him the paperwork wrong, and then filing a Motion in court to address that, he did not respond at all.
There is a reason for that. If he opens himself up to what he did to me, and his 2 lawyers are called as witnesses as they were in the appeal hearing, they could be subject to perjury if they are not truthful, and they lost that hearing.
No court can refuse to issue a default ruling, since George has chosen to default and not file any answer, nor be represented.
Texas law
Default Rule 55
At this point, I am the only party to the case, and the court has to issue a default and has refused to do so. So we have to ask why?
US courts are filled with corruption, in fact USA has sunk so low that it ranks 126th out of 139
Courts are the only remedy for our injustices and they are filled with corruption, lifetime appointments, and very few consequences for court staff's actions. They can be removed, but very few are ever charged with crimes. But they are failing this country so miserably
A default is one of the simplest tasks to issue, it means the other party chose not to appear, and does not have regard for the law, or simply does not want to self-incriminate. Most people appear, those that do not, cannot face what it means to appear on their own behalf
https://www.txwd.uscourts.gov/court-staff/u-s-magistrate-judge-elizabeth-s-betsy-chestney/
Valeria Sandovalt is the court clerk for this judge, won't return my calls, and has failed to issue a clerk's default.
When a court ignores the rules, there is something wrong.
They also cannot refuse to do their job.
I just wanted the money that I am entitled to, and I had not wanted to do anything more. The courts try to victimize people that come to seek justice, and it's becoming more rare to get it.
People have options, from filing criminal complaints against those that breach their fiduciary duty
I am taking the next steps to be paid the money and losses I have suffered at the hands of those that took it, and those that are preventing me from access to get a ruling to go after it.
Their bias has to come from somewhere but when they won't do their job, and they won't recuse themselves, you have to ask what are they doing?
/s/ Natasha Athens October 3, 2023
.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
'%3E%3Cpath d='M15.9972 7.9996c0 4.418-3.5815 7.9996-7.9996 7.9996-4.418 0-7.9996-3.5816-7.9996-7.9996S3.5796 0 7.9976 0c4.4181 0 7.9996 3.5815 7.9996 7.9996Z' fill='url(%23paint0_linear_15251_63610)'/%3E%3Cpath d='M15.9973 7.9992c0 4.4178-3.5811 7.9992-7.9987 7.9992C3.5811 15.9984 0 12.417 0 7.9992S3.5811 0 7.9986 0c4.4176 0 7.9987 3.5814 7.9987 7.9992Z' fill='url(%23paint1_radial_15251_63610)'/%3E%3Cpath d='M15.9972 7.9996c0 4.418-3.5815 7.9996-7.9996 7.9996-4.418 0-7.9996-3.5816-7.9996-7.9996S3.5796 0 7.9976 0c4.4181 0 7.9996 3.5815 7.9996 7.9996Z' fill='url(%23paint2_radial_15251_63610)' fill-opacity='.8'/%3E%3Cpath d='M12.3955 9.0853c0 1.1142-.4 1.1142-1.2 1.1142-.7999 0-1.1999 0-1.1999-1.1143 0-.8205.5372-1.4856 1.1999-1.4856s1.2.6651 1.2 1.4857ZM5.9956 9.0853c0 1.1142-.4 1.1142-1.2 1.1142-.8 0-1.1999 0-1.1999-1.1143 0-.8205.5372-1.4856 1.2-1.4856.6626 0 1.1999.6651 1.1999 1.4857Z' fill='%231C1C1D'/%3E%3Cpath fill-rule='evenodd' clip-rule='evenodd' d='M7.9936 11.5994c1.3257 0 2.3999.292 2.3999.8023 0 .4234-1.0742.3973-2.3999.3973-1.3256 0-2.3998.0261-2.3998-.3973 0-.5103 1.0742-.8023 2.3998-.8023Z' fill='%234B280E'/%3E%3Cpath fill-rule='evenodd' clip-rule='evenodd' d='M13.3283 7.0331a.4.4 0 0 0-.5444-.1535c-.4415.2472-1.0866.4228-1.7434.5373-.6488.1132-1.2697.1604-1.6367.1691a.4.4 0 1 0 .0191.7997c.4037-.0096 1.0643-.0602 1.755-.1807.6828-.119 1.4354-.313 1.9969-.6275a.4.4 0 0 0 .1535-.5444ZM2.491 7.0331a.4.4 0 0 1 .5444-.1535c.4416.2472 1.0866.4228 1.7434.5373.6488.1132 1.2697.1604 1.6367.1691a.4.4 0 1 1-.019.7997c-.4038-.0096-1.0643-.0602-1.7551-.1807-.6827-.119-1.4353-.313-1.9968-.6275a.4.4 0 0 1-.1536-.5444Z' fill='%23BC0A26'/%3E%3C/g%3E%3Cdefs%3E%3CradialGradient id='paint1_radial_15251_63610' cx='0' cy='0' r='1' gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse' gradientTransform='matrix(0 7.9992 -7.99863 0 7.9986 7.9992)'%3E%3Cstop offset='.8134' stop-color='%23FA2E3E' stop-opacity='0'/%3E%3Cstop offset='1' stop-color='%23FA2E3E' stop-opacity='.1'/%3E%3C/radialGradient%3E%3CradialGradient id='paint2_radial_15251_63610' cx='0' cy='0' r='1' gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse' gradientTransform='rotate(45 -4.5272 10.9202) scale(10.1818)'%3E%3Cstop stop-color='%23FFB169'/%3E%3Cstop offset='1' stop-color='%23FFB169' stop-opacity='0'/%3E%3C/radialGradient%3E%3ClinearGradient id='paint0_linear_15251_63610' x1='2.396' y1='2.3999' x2='13.5954' y2='13.5993' gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse'%3E%3Cstop stop-color='%23FFB169'/%3E%3Cstop offset='1' stop-color='%23FF5758'/%3E%3C/linearGradient%3E%3CclipPath id='clip0_15251_63610'%3E%3Cpath fill='%23fff' d='M-.004 0h15.9993v15.9992H-.004z'/%3E%3C/clipPath%3E%3C/defs%3E%3C/svg%3E){kind=small}
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)